In the active vanguard of the new "Supranational Undemocratic Revolutionary Totalitarianism" of the 21st century: the Islamic Radical Intransigent Fundamentalism (the IRIF).
Brilliant, characteristic and terrible origins, stimulated and trained by the Jomeini's Revolutionary Guards.
The organization arises after the Israeli invasion of the Lebanon in June, 1982. Taking advantage of the great reigning confusion for it, between the established Lebanese different factions (among them, Amal, the Shiite political religious organization which was receiving then the loyalties of the great majority of the Lebanese Shiites), the neighboring states and the great powers. Hezbollah is going to prosper in the emptiness of power and action created by the frustration of some ones and the weariness and the skepticism of others. Its catalyst is going to be the Islamic republic of Iran. Which is going to infiltrate through the Antilebanon mountain chain up to the Bekaa altiplane, her revolutionary, selected, capable and motivated "volunteers", throughout the first months following the invasion. They were not too many. But the sufficient ones to indoctrinate, train armed militias and support and stimulate the creation of local active Shiite groups. This was Hezbollah's original core. It is curious that the Americans were waiting until August 15, 2007, to officially qualify as a terrorist entity the Iranian Revolutionary Guard. The ideological elite military force at the direct service of the fundamentalist Iranian theocracy. That allows the USA government, to prosecute the business and the financing of this armed autonomous group, which possesses more than 250 thousand armed men, the figures are very variable according to the sources, with its own naval, land and air units.
Possibilities and Faults of the Conflicting Rivals.
Why can win the Iraqi authorities?
The whole virulence and force estimated in the Iraqi insurgency are ballasted by his divisions, his divergent or opposite interests, his scanty real combative capacity and his problems to join combative major effective units. The people is neutral in these moments and only a certain degree of constraint, at least suggested, inclines it punctually and temporarily in favor of one or other. The Iraqi army is lacking experience, spirit of body and combative interest; but it is native, not occupant, and does not depart from zero and with the skill and professionalism of his advisors and cadres, it can advance stages rapidly. The cost to pay for all is the time, prolonged in an internal painful and costly struggle...
How it was interpreted and it is interpreted today? What role could have terrorists in it? Is it possible to come to a pacific living together with most of the Islamic people? How can we control the imames, the preachers and readers in mosques, almost always without a reliable, sole and canonic formation in the Koran and the Sura? What can really do the ulemas and muftis (the Islamic Law doctors) in order to control the “Terrorism in the name of the Islam” and establish a reliable peace of the Islam with all peoples in the World?
ITS REAL POSSIBILITIES AS TERRORISTS' USABLE WEAPON AND IN THE MODERN WARFARE. ITS INSTRUMENTS AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT.
The biological warfare is the military use, as war weapon, of the living pathogenic, animal or plant organisms, and of the natural poisonous products, called toxins. Since the germs and the bacteria are used in it, it is also called germ warfare, though this term only incorporates a part of the biological agents capable of being used aggressively against the men.
Stalingrad (1942) and the Iraqis cities (2007). Are they two "parallel battles"?
In the description that follows, our intelligent reader will be able to see the similarities and the differences of these urban battles. And to extract his conclusions and possibilities. They are separated in the time by 65 years, but they are sensitively equal in the fighting forms. In they the defensive starts with a qualitative advantage. Only they are really separated by the different commands´ intentions and the capacities of both defenses.
By Enrique Alonso
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Enrique Alonso has a Master Degree in Chemical Sciences by the University of Oviedo. Also, he has a degree in Petroleum Chemical and Technology by the University of Madrid. He is author of several books on military theory in Spanish and English. The most recent title is "On the Nature of War". He is a permanent collaborator of the Spanish magazine "War Heat Internacional", publishing articles about historical and military topics.
Enrique Alonso has a Master Degree in Chemical Sciences by the University of Oviedo. Also, he has a degree in Petroleum Chemical and Technology by the University of Madrid. He is author of several books on military theory in Spanish and English. The most recent title is "On the Nature of War". He is a permanent collaborator of the Spanish magazine "War Heat Internacional", publishing articles about historical and military topics.
